httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steffen" <i...@apachelounge.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review
Date Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:56:12 GMT
I have no zlib1.dll on my box and mod_deflate works fine. It's 
included/static in mod-deflate.so.

Next time I shall ship it too, does not harm.

Steffen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 05 September, 2007 21:40
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate 
tarballs for review


> Steffen wrote:
>> little things:
>>
>> mod_bucketeer.so is not build out of the box with Win32 gui-build.
>
> Not necessary (except for testers).  Trivial for the developer to
> create (along with many similar testing modules - instead of building
> the BuildBin target, use BuildAll target.
>
>> zlib1.dll is now copied to /bin , seems to me not necessary.
>
> zlib1.dll doesn't come from Microsoft, it's quite necessary.  (I can't
> imagine you don't ship it?!?)  It's used by mod_deflate, and also by
> openssl 0.9.8 - we anticipate most 2.2 users to use that version as it
> was current when Apache 2.2.0 was first released.
>
> In 2.0 we anticipated 0.9.7 which doesn't enable zlib by default, and
> we had compiled the required zlib 1.1.x sources into mod_deflate.
>
> 


Mime
View raw message