Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
In-Reply-To: <20070819110845.GC10089@infiltrator.gizzard.com>
References: <46C76E04.1040907@rowe-clan.net>
 <001e01c7e1eb$312968b0$2128c23e@mother> <46C78135.9020301@rowe-clan.net>
 <000801c7e1f1$217656c0$2128c23e@mother> <46C78832.1070400@beamartyr.net>
 <46C7A10A.9030209@bellatlantic.net>
 <20070819110845.GC10089@infiltrator.gizzard.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <52FC620A-4789-43AA-81B1-C2D66F42A055@jaguNET.com>
Cc: Tom.Donovan@acm.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: Apachelounge problems
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 10:57:10 -0400
To: dev@httpd.apache.org


On Aug 19, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 09:46:50PM -0400, Tom Donovan wrote:
>> Maybe not threatening - but it is an eye-opener for some of us  
>> that the
>> Apache2 license protects "released" versions of Apache differently.
>
> It doesn't.
>
>> My (possibly faulty) understanding was that the whole  
>> "Redistribution"
>> and "Disclaimer of Warranty" parts applied to *any* Apache software -
>> even if it was built from today's bug-ridden head revision of the  
>> trunk,
>
> It does.
>

Released s/w is very very different from s/w that people can
obtain from trunk via svn themselves. The former is an
official distribution of a software project from the PMC (and
hence the ASF). The latter is not.