Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98592 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2007 21:43:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2007 21:43:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 19408 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2007 21:43:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19335 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2007 21:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 19324 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2007 21:43:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:43:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.182] (HELO smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:43:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 4920 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.182) with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0000 Message-ID: <46D739C6.8030808@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:42:30 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Blackdot.be (ApacheMon & ApacheMobile) - Questions sparked by the ApacheLounge fuss References: <43e40e000708240712x59482860t951f06b37273fa77@mail.gmail.com> <20070824142427.GA11126@eilebrecht.net> <43e40e000708300700n611e313p2dd0b17d12ab499c@mail.gmail.com> <46D738E2.1010504@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <46D738E2.1010504@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Jorge Schrauwen wrote: >> I'd like to add an additional note to this but I'm unsure in how to >> phrase it. >> What I want to say is: >> That I take the source tarball's that are posted e.g. >> httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip (only official release no T&R, svn etc). >> >> I'd also like to knew if I need to add an additional disclaimer that I >> don't offer any warranties if somehow (unlikely) manage to cost a >> company huge sums of money and they want to sue me. > > If you simply note these are the officially released sources and you > provide compiled binaries under the Apache License 2.0 (with no warranty > as spelled out under that license), you should be in reasonably good shape. > > If you export from a country that has cryptographic export controls (e.g. > computer programs-as-munitions) you should either avoid shipping any SSL > components or be very careful to follow the export regulations. And as Jim says, don't take this as legal advise, you are best to consult with a lawyer, or a software redistributor in your country who's thoroughly reviewed the issue of redistributing or building binaries of open source software. Note there can be legal differences between a program source code and a functioning, compiled program, depending on your jursidiction ;-) Bill