Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34345 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2007 07:29:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2007 07:29:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 71808 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2007 07:29:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 71740 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2007 07:29:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 71729 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2007 07:29:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:29:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.181] (HELO smtpauth01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 07:30:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 12672 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2007 07:29:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpauth01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.181) with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2007 07:29:14 -0000 Message-ID: <46C942C9.3060803@rowe-clan.net> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:29:13 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: resolving piped logging bugs... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just a quick update; I have windows running again after creating a NUL (/dev/null) association for the parent processes' stdout handle. It solves a regression introduced in r483967 on Windows. I'm somewhat puzzled, on traditional unix, NO_PIPE values for stdin/out/err would pass no fd at all, AIUI. It seems (?) that we presume they clone the parent's respective handles, if spelled out explicitly? We have a ton of leaking pipes and I'm trying to hunt them all down. Found the big one, we never set our own stderr handle as non-inherited before spawning the replacement stderr handler process, so it was *still* holding the old piped error logger open (just, not as stderr 'proper', but a plain old file handle). Still problems to hunt down, this is 40 hours into it. But I should have the simplest possible patches ready sometime tomorrow for folks to comment on and review. Bill