Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40747 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2007 12:02:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2007 12:02:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 65369 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2007 12:02:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65306 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2007 12:02:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65295 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2007 12:02:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:02:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:02:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 40615 invoked by uid 2161); 4 Aug 2007 12:01:53 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 923901721C for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 14:01:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46B46AA8.3040801@apache.org> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:01:44 +0200 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: T&R schedule References: <5EC0435F-DDF3-4CC2-B0FA-F4AA5B28957D@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <5EC0435F-DDF3-4CC2-B0FA-F4AA5B28957D@jaguNET.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08/03/2007 06:21 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Lets shoot for a T&R of 1.3, 2.0 and 2.2 on Aug 10th... That > means a possible release on the 13th. That way, admins > aren't compelled to upgrade before/during the weekend (other- > wise, T&R on the 8th and release on the 10th would make > sense) +1 in general, but I think the timing of T&R should be independent from admins needs. It should be more driven by the ability of people to test the RC. If we want to give admins a calm Friday and weekend we simply should extend the voting time / postpone the release announcement to the beginning of the week. Regards Ru"diger