Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4806 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2007 16:02:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2007 16:02:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 14315 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2007 16:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14264 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2007 16:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14253 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2007 16:02:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:02:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:02:30 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2186CAA4F17 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:02:11 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <20070830155602.GD67279@deejai2.mch.fsc.net> References: <20070830152928.492F71A9832@eris.apache.org> <200708301536.l7UFaIhq076567@devsys.jaguNET.com> <20070830155602.GD67279@deejai2.mch.fsc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1AC6E2F3-E6F1-4C38-8901-6D62F0735F62@jagunet.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: svn commit: r571209 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/proxy/ajp_header.c Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:02:10 -0400 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 30, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Martin Kraemer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:36:18AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Are these really candidates for bypassing the >> normal backport process from trunk?? > > I committed the other change (memcmp->strcmp) righty now on trunk. > And yes, I am aware that I should have done that first, sorry. > I'll wait for you to read my other Email... we seem to be out of phase :) Basically: you cannot patch 2.2 directly without proposing patches in STATUS and having them voted on, since 2.2 is the stable branch and is RTC.