httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r568779 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/main.c
Date Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:13:55 GMT

On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:05 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> But I admit that this is harder to audit and is more likely to  
>> change at some
>> point of time to the usage of a pool.
>
> More to the point, implementation of apr_ctime.  The alternative of  
> no error
> at all or no timestamp seemed worse, to me.  Maybe an XXX comment  
> on trunk
> to that effect?  (I don't so much care about 0.9/1.2 which aren't  
> moving
> targets, like trunk).

Yeah, the conditions and assumptions on which this
is based warrant some comments in the code :)


Mime
View raw message