httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release candidate tarballs for review
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:10:54 GMT

On Aug 13, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:

>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Nick Kew
>> Gesendet: Montag, 13. August 2007 14:54
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.5, 2.0.60 1.3.38 release
>> candidate tarballs for review
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:02:53 -0400
>> Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Depending on the speed in which APR 0.9.15, we may
>>> go ahead with a fully combined 1.3/2.0/2.2 release
>>> (as originally planned)
>>
>> Rushed schedules lead to more bugs ...
>>
>>> 	 or release 1.3/2.2 earlier
>>> than 2.0...
>>
>> Maybe put out the announcements together, with "2.0 availability
>> delayed briefly due to issues with the bundled APR".
>
> So I would say lets drop a 2.0.x release this time completely and
> release 2.0.61 in conjunction with 2.2.6 in about 8 weeks (as planned
> by Jim for 2.2.6). This should be enough time to get apr 0.9.15 out
> of the door without too much rush.
>

2.0.60/61 does have a few CVS vuln's that would be nice
to close and release earlier than 2 months from now :)
Mime
View raw message