httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm MacCarthaigh <c...@stdlib.net>
Subject Re: Apachelounge has to remove Apachelounge Feather, be warned
Date Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:48:57 GMT
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 02:40:39PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> The bottom line is that nobody took issue with Jeff's or my comments.  They
> are free to do so.  Colm has this time around.  His points don't quite jive,
> if you offered a patch set and said "hey, this is the difference between
> the ASF's 2.2.4 and my binaries here", then his point would be spot-on and
> we'd all agree there is no issue. 

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about here, and what
points jive or not.

> I couldn't find the argument for releasing our *candidates* on
> external sites from Colm's observations.

Our candidates are 100% redistributable and licensed in accordance with
AL2.0, just like our svn trees. It says so right there in them, and
we're pretty familiar with that the AL permits. If someone wants to take
our candidates and put it on another site, they are plainly free to do
so. 

-- 
Colm MacCárthaigh                        Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net

Mime
View raw message