Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33600 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2007 17:00:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2007 17:00:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 40577 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 17:00:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 40128 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2007 17:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 40117 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2007 17:00:51 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:00:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.85.100.6] (HELO mail2.odu.neva.ru) (194.85.100.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:00:48 -0700 Received: from [194.85.100.33] (buc.odu.neva.ru [194.85.100.33]) by mail2.odu.neva.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075B2780A4 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 21:00:27 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <469269AA.5040004@odu.neva.ru> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:00:26 +0400 From: Dmitry Butskoy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070530 Fedora/1.0.9-1.fc5 SeaMonkey/1.0.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind needs hosting References: <469253BE.4090503@odu.neva.ru> <469263AC.8030700@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <469263AC.8030700@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Yet and still, there is the minor issue that NTLM violates RFC2616, and as > such you might find resistance here :) > OTOH, such a module allows to choose a Linux/UNIX server for web or proxy, even in "strong" Windows environment (where users must be authenticated against a Windows Domain Controller). In other words, to choose some open-sourse solution even in such an environment. ~buc