httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>
Subject Re: Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
Date Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:26:16 GMT


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: news  Im Auftrag von Bill Barker
> Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 05:07
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Not strictly true, it's just that it's never graduated from 
> "experimental" 
> due to lack of user interest.  Unfortunately, it got dropped 
> from the build 
> (I've just fixed that), so you need to apply R547503 to get 
> it.  If you do 
> (w/o the APR  native binary installed):
>    <Connector protocol="AJP/1.3" port="0"
>          channelNioSocket.port="8009"
>          channelNioSocket.bufferSize="16384"
>          channelNioSocket.maxThreads="125"
>          channelNioSocket.minSpareThreads="10"
>          channelNioSocket.maxSpareThreads="50"
>          />
> 
> you will get the experimental NIO/AJP Connector.  Of course, 
> most of the 
> attributes are optional (but if you can spare the memory, the 
> bufferSize 
> improves performance a lot if you have a lot of POST requests).

Thanks for the hints Bill.

Regards

Rüdiger


Mime
View raw message