Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24396 invoked from network); 30 May 2007 21:36:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2007 21:36:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 98767 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2007 21:36:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98491 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2007 21:36:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98478 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2007 21:36:40 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:36:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 30 May 2007 14:36:35 -0700 Received: (qmail 15912 invoked by uid 2161); 30 May 2007 21:36:15 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 0AA231721C for ; Wed, 30 May 2007 23:36:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <465DEE52.8080504@apache.org> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:36:18 +0200 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: de, en, de-de, en-gb, cy, zu, xh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: httpd 1.3 / 2.0 / 2.2 tags this weekend? References: <465D11FF.6030806@rowe-clan.net> <465D4456.9020405@apache.org> <20070530203752.40cc3ea4@grimnir> In-Reply-To: <20070530203752.40cc3ea4@grimnir> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 05/30/2007 09:37 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > > We also have remaining bugfixes that *should* go in. > PR#39710 is simple enough to review, and another release without Good reminder. I just casted my vote for the backport. So lets hope that we get the missing +1. > fixing that would be a huge WTF??? I'm also part way through > reviewing Chris's mod_dbd rewrite. It's clearly an improvement on > what we have, but getting three +1s by the weekend seems optimistic. > Yes, that would be very optimistic. IMHO his patches deserve more attention, but I am currently too short on time and not so familar with the mod_dbd code that I can do this. But as there are several proposals from Chris, you and Chris may be able to advice which of them are most important / easiest to review. So maybe some "lower" hanging fruits :-). Regards Rüdiger