Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-57358-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62987 invoked from network); 30 May 2007 06:20:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 May 2007 06:20:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 7386 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2007 06:20:47 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6587 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2007 06:20:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6576 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2007 06:20:45 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 23:20:45 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of chip@force-elite.com
 designates 66.225.25.189 as permitted sender)
Received: from [66.225.25.189] (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com)
 (66.225.25.189)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2007 23:20:39 -0700
X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com
Received: from Water-2.local (127.0.0.1:57067)
	by localhost with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
	id <S1738F3> for <dev@httpd.apache.org> from <chip@force-elite.com>;
	Tue, 29 May 2007 23:20:14 -0700
Message-ID: <465D1796.8040307@force-elite.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 23:20:06 -0700
From: Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: httpd 1.3 / 2.0 / 2.2 tags this weekend?
References: <465D11FF.6030806@rowe-clan.net>
In-Reply-To: <465D11FF.6030806@rowe-clan.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'd like to see new tarballs rolled soonish, given the single significant
> bug that was disclosed earlier today.
> 
> Obviously most mass-vhosters are capable of compiling their own binary,
> so providing the seperate-pid-table patch (whoever gets around to writing
> one) resolves any immediate urgency.

I don't believe its a critical security issue -- if you can run code on
the server, as the server process, we can't defend against it.  This
seems to me like a battle line firmly in the scripting languages land.

Anyways, until we have a patch that we can consider, I'm in no hurry.

On APR{,-Util}: Likely a good idea anyways.

-Paul