Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18418 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2007 22:28:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2007 22:28:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 41455 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2007 22:28:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41341 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2007 22:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41330 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2007 22:28:13 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:28:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.201.200.73] (HELO urchin.earth.li) (193.201.200.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:28:06 -0700 Received: from stuart by urchin.earth.li with local (Exim 4.50) id 1HZDxB-0001hv-AT for dev@httpd.apache.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:27:45 +0100 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 23:27:45 +0100 From: Stuart Children To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: ProxyErrorOverride and redirects (PR 39245) Message-ID: <20070404222745.GA4362@urchin.earth.li> References: <1404e5910704040748h65c2624fja9537874fa824844@mail.gmail.com> <20070404163031.71e4da7b@grimnir> <20070404213431.GA27973@urchin.earth.li> <20070404224027.4961cff9@grimnir> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070404224027.4961cff9@grimnir> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:40:27PM +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > > Whatever happens, the documentation should be clarified. But to my > > mind there is no doubt that I would not expect a redirect (or Not > > Modified for that matter) to be considered an error. > > The semantics of "Error" here are the same as in "ErrorDocument" > (which is, after all, what you're invoking with ProxyErrorOverride). Absolutely. Only if I RTFM: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#errordocument it says "In the event of a problem or error". So what's wrong with what I've said? I take "problem/error" to not include 3xx responses. If you disagree then the documentation would appear to not be clear enough to one or other of us. Given it does not explicitly indicate behaviour in this particular matter, we should look at what the code does; which _was_ not to treat them as errors... until someone made a change at which point it broke peoples' assumptions/environments and caused them to file bugs. -- Stuart