Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52233 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2007 22:42:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2007 22:42:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 31454 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2007 22:42:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31392 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2007 22:42:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31381 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2007 22:42:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:42:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:42:06 -0800 Received: (qmail 52199 invoked by uid 2161); 3 Mar 2007 22:41:45 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id A51461721C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:41:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45E9F9A1.10303@apache.org> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:41:37 +0100 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: de, en, de-de, en-gb, cy, zu, xh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Mod_cache expires check References: <45AB7A0E.5050409@hippo.nl> <45AE85B6.20702@apache.org> <45AEC2A1.8050902@haxent.com.br> <45B6B0B0.8080705@hippo.nl> <45E9ABA7.2050501@hippo.nl> In-Reply-To: <45E9ABA7.2050501@hippo.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/03/2007 06:08 PM, Bart van der Schans wrote: > Bart van der Schans wrote: > >> Davi Arnaut wrote: >> > >> > Looking at it more, the previous check it's also useless. Attempted >> patch... >> >> I finally had some time to test the patch and it seems to work >> correctly. It still recognizes Unix epoch as a bad date, but mod_cache >> won't cache it. >> > > Is there any change the patch from Davi will make it in the trunk (and > hopefully backported to the branch)? What is the correct way to move > forward with this? Can I help in some way? Providing a better reference to the patch you are talking about would be a start :-). Seriously, in general you are correct in bugging us here and the help you can offer varies from case to case (testing, providing documentation, rewriting the patch according to review remarks, etc.) Regards R�diger