httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: sed filter module
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:45:10 GMT

On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:34 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2007, at 1:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> Is this sed or pcre syntax?  I'm a bit confused :)
>> It's a mutant ;) But, of course, we maintain
>> that confusion internally with regex's being pcre...
> Of course :)  But it appears to be a tiny fraction of the sed  
> language...
>>> Although it's sed-ish, is it misleading to confuse the user with the
>>> phrase sed considering the unsupported constructs?  E.g. I presume
>>> the more complex sed language features aren't present.
>>> I'm wondering if mod_pcre_filter wouldn't be more accurate?
>> 'sed' certainly gets the message across though :)
>> But basically it allows for regex pattern matching
>> and substitution in a very sed-like way.
> since it is only a pattern substitution subset, I'd prefer to see some
> RewriteBody directive or similar.  As I'm looking at the module,  
> I'm more
> convinced that Sed "foo" should be reserved for at least a basic sed
> implementation that implemented (at least!) the pre-GNU language  
> subset.


Well, like I said, the main issue was avoiding the overhead of
having mod_ext_filter do simple in-line replacements by calling
sed to do 's/foo/bar/'... So yeah, it's closer to what a Perl
guy would think than a Unix sed-head :)

View raw message