httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <n...@webthing.com>
Subject Re: -T commandline argument for 2.0.x
Date Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:31:56 GMT
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:06:03 +0100
"Jan van den Berg" <jan.vandenberg@isp.solcon.nl> wrote:

> Please have a look at "bug"/patch:
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41887
> 
>  
> 
> This is my first ever contribution to an OS project of such, and
> therefore I'd like to know the chances of getting this patch in the
> main tree.

First impression: the patch makes sense.  And now it's available
on bugzilla for anyone who looks.  But it's of limited applicability,
because the problem it fixes is just one of many serious drawbacks of 
running large numbers of vhosts without using a mass-virtual-hosting
solution.

Getting it adopted depends on finding support amongst committers.
In the case of a patch that isn't fixing a security issue or some
howler of a bug, that's much more likely to happen in /trunk/
(and thence 2.2) than in 2.0.  If there were patches against all
three branches, there's a chance they'd all be applied.

> If I need to alter the patch for this to happen, let me know.
> 
> (ie did I use the correct variable naming, are the declarations in the
> right header files etc.?)

Looks fine to me.

-- 
Nick Kew

Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/

Mime
View raw message