Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40190 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2007 00:48:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2007 00:48:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 17535 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 00:48:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17307 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2007 00:48:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17296 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2007 00:48:56 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:48:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.182] (HELO smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:48:45 -0800 Received: (qmail 26910 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2007 00:48:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (24.15.193.17) by smtpauth02-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.182) with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2007 00:48:24 -0000 Message-ID: <45D3ADBA.8050803@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:47:54 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 3.0 - Introduction References: <45D2BB05.9030400@force-elite.com> <45D39038.6050707@force-elite.com> <45D395F8.8080209@rowe-clan.net> <4E479EB3-370E-41BF-88B7-88398063FCDC@gbiv.com> In-Reply-To: <4E479EB3-370E-41BF-88B7-88398063FCDC@gbiv.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > I was planning on creating > > repos/asf/httpd/sandbox/amsterdam/ > > and then moving the GSoC stuff to other subdirectories of that > sandbox. I prefer to think of branches as forks off of trunk, > whereas the sandbox would not be. Ok... that's another way. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/ already contains several sandboxes, but these could be moved as well. I need to jump back into fips-dev now that openssl-fips-1.1.1 has it's glossy certificate again. > Although, we could do both, with a bunch of sandboxes to play with > ideas and then a branch to act as the "what everyone has agreed to > merge so far" tree. That is, assuming we don't want to displace > trunk yet. *shrug* If we do decide to open trunk to what become '3.0' changes, I'd only ask that we take 5 minutes to branch 2.3.x first. Bill