Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77185 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2007 21:40:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2007 21:40:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 14558 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2007 21:40:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14498 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2007 21:40:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14487 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2007 21:40:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:40:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:40:50 -0800 Received: (qmail 76883 invoked by uid 2161); 13 Feb 2007 21:40:28 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 23F321721C for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:40:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45D2304D.7080707@apache.org> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:40:29 +0100 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: de, en, de-de, en-gb, cy, zu, xh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Enabling arbitrary/unregistered methods for 2.0 References: <45D21397.3010800@Golux.Com> In-Reply-To: <45D21397.3010800@Golux.Com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 02/13/2007 08:37 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Here's a patch to allow the Script directive to handle > arbitrary (e.g., site-specific or experimental) methods. > Current 2.0 behaviour is 'if it's not something hard-coded > into me, it's rubbish and gets tossed.' > > I notice that this functionality already exists in trunk, > so this is essentially a feature^Woversight-correction backport. Any particular reason why you are not using the same code as in trunk / 2.2.x? The change on trunk was done in r98646 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=98646) So I would propose that you just add it to the STATUS file of 2.0.x. Provided that you propose to backport r98646 (which works for 2.0.x) you have my +1 on it. Regards R�diger