Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8417 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2007 18:38:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2007 18:38:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 30802 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2007 18:38:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 30533 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2007 18:38:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 30522 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2007 18:38:55 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:38:55 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.200.253] (HELO smtp105.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.200.253) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:38:44 -0800 Received: (qmail 28381 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2007 18:38:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO WS) (greg@headingup.net@64.142.28.99 with login) by smtp105.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2007 18:38:22 -0000 From: "Greg Sims" To: Subject: Large Resource Consumption by One User Access to mp3 File Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:38:21 -0800 Message-ID: <000701c74bb0$5108d890$650a2b0a@WS> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_01C74B6D.42E59890" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: AcdLsE63tWvtLDxHSwufyDxRWNGX/g== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C74B6D.42E59890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I originally posted this to the user support list and received no feedback in two weeks. I appreciate your help with this in advance. Our Apache/2.0.46 server is stopping as a result of a single user accessing one of two mp3 files. I gathered some log data to detail the problem: http://raystedman.org/4204Ref.txt contains a log sequence for one mp3 file by one user. http://raystedman.org/mp3/4204.mp3 is the file being accessed which is almost 7MB. I normally only see one record in the logs per mp3 file transferred. In this case there are 30+ entries over 12 minutes in the logs for this one transfer. It is likely this user has limited memory or is connected by modem to the Internet. http://raystedman.org/22Stat.txt is an extended server-status showing the aftermath of all this. Please note the number of workers that were allocated to this one user. This consumption of resource seems unfair to other users that are trying to use the system at the same time. Is it possible to control resource allocation so that it is fair to all users? Thanks! Greg ------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C74B6D.42E59890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I originally posted this to the user support list and received no feedback in two weeks. I appreciate your help with = this in advance.

Our Apache/2.0.46 server is stopping as a result of a = single user accessing one of two mp3 files. I gathered some log data to = detail the problem:

http://raystedman.org/4204Ref.= txt contains a log sequence for one mp3 file by one = user.

http://raystedman.org/mp3/420= 4.mp3 is the file being accessed which is almost = 7MB.

I normally only see one record in the logs per mp3 = file transferred. In this case there are 30+ entries over 12 minutes in = the logs for this one transfer. It is likely this user has limited memory or = is connected by modem to the Internet.

http://raystedman.org/22Stat.tx= t is an extended server-status showing the aftermath of all this. = Please note the number of workers that were allocated to this one user. =

This consumption of resource seems unfair to other = users that are trying to use the system at the same time. Is it possible = to control resource allocation so that it is fair to all = users?

Thanks! Greg

------=_NextPart_000_0008_01C74B6D.42E59890--