httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Garrett Rooney" <roo...@electricjellyfish.net>
Subject Re: 3.0 - Proposed Requirements
Date Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:02:50 GMT
On 2/14/07, Greg Marr <gregm@alum.wpi.edu> wrote:
> At 08:33 AM 2/14/2007, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> >On 2/14/07, Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com> wrote:
> >>This proposed list of requirements for a 3.0 platform. this list
> >>enables
> >>a 'base' level of performance and design decisions to be made. If
> >>others
> >>can make designs work with 'lessor' requirements, all the better, but
> >>I'm not worried about it.
> >>
> >>Proposed Requirements:
> >>- C99 Compiler.
> >
> >Are there any C99 compilers?  I was under the impression that GCC was
> >close, but nobody else really seemed to be pushing for it (i.e.
> >Microsoft doesn't seem to care).
>
> According to all the information I've found, the only C99 features
> that Visual Studio 2005 supports are "long long", variadic macros,
> and C++ style comments (which they've supported for years because of
> requests from C++ customers).

Well, varardic macros are one of the really nice features of c99, but
I'm not sure that's really enough justification for requiring it...

-garrett

Mime
View raw message