httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Bumping question
Date Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:12:58 GMT
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> Would the following change in mod_cache.h require a major bump or would a minor bump
be enough?
> 
>  APR_DECLARE_OPTIONAL_FN(apr_status_t,
>                          ap_cache_generate_key,
> -                        (request_rec *r, apr_pool_t*p, char**key ));
> +                        (request_rec *r, apr_pool_t*p, char**key, cache_request_rec
*cache));

That one is a major bump by definition, you broke, you didn't enhance ABI.

> Or do we need no bump at all as we currently do not install mod_cache.h in the includes
directory
> and thus all things defined in mod_cache.h can be considered private?

I'll agree with Joe on this, that since mod_cache.h isn't really a public
interface yet.  But we better put a big red warning in CHANGES that we
broke any third party caching modules or providers.

Mime
View raw message