Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75783 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2007 01:06:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2007 01:06:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 62597 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2007 01:06:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62532 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2007 01:06:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62521 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2007 01:06:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:06:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of dev-apache.org@humph.com designates 88.149.180.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [88.149.180.233] (HELO ns.ondecorte.net) (88.149.180.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:06:50 -0800 Received: from albook.humph.com ([192.168.60.5]) by ns.ondecorte.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id JBXSET-0004LB-IO for dev@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:06:29 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: <45ABB459.7030905@sharp.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9F43F8B8-506B-421F-80A7-5487A87BCCC6@humph.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Giuliano Gavazzi Subject: Re: mod_disk_cache and mod_include bugs and suggestions Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:06:30 +0100 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 16 Jan 2007, at 01:08, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: > r470455 I should have really kept this branch of the thread separate. Let me just state, to avoid confusion later: 1) r470455 cache imported in the 2.2.4 tag, shows the cache discarding behaviour when combined with SSI exec cmd. So it might as well be a problem in the mix, I will test as soon as possible a coherent revision. 2) pure 2.2.4 tag, shown the cache corruption behaviour when with SSI exec cmd. Giuliano