Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31684 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 21:41:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 21:41:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 88741 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 21:41:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88669 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 21:41:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88656 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2007 21:41:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:41:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:40:56 -0800 Received: (qmail 30230 invoked by uid 2161); 11 Jan 2007 21:40:11 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 6A0F31721C for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:40:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45A6AEC4.9080404@apache.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:40:20 +0100 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 X-Accept-Language: de, en, de-de, en-gb, cy, zu, xh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla References: <45A6A13E.8080609@apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 01/11/2007 10:12 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> could someone please add version 2.2.4 to the product Apache httpd-2 >> in bugzilla? > > > Done. Thanks. > >> Are there any ideas how we can document / automate this as part of >> the release process? >> This issue pops up regulary after each release. > > > Hard to automate... but we could include it in the release checklist: > Ask Bugzilla admin to add new version. I am one, and will be happy to I am happy to add it to this list once somebody gives me a pointer where to find it. I only found the shell scripts for creating the tar balls. > ...and 183 in Resolved or Verified: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Apache% > 20httpd-2&version=2.2- > HEAD&version=2.2.0&version=2.2.2&version=2.2.3&version=2.2.4&bug_status= > RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED > > Of the latter: > > 60 are Resolved, Invalid > 7 are Resolved, Wontfix > 1 is Resolved, Later > 37 are Resolved, Duplicate > 70 are Resolved, Fixed > 8 are Resolved, Worksforme > 0 are Verified > > These can probably be closed in some way, shape or form. What do you > think is sufficient inactivity to amount to lazy verification of a > Resolution transition? A week? Can I get a hum on that? A week sounds good to me. I guess some of them are my fault as I only set them to resolved fixed and never visited them again as I thought that they reached their final state. Now I found out that you only have the option to close it once it has moved to a 'resolved' state and 'closed' should be the final state. I will take better care of this in the future. Is there any chance to close all the ones in resolved state that have not been touched for a week in one blow? Regards R�diger