Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16700 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2007 01:14:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jan 2007 01:14:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 62811 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2007 01:14:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62656 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2007 01:14:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 62580 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2007 01:14:54 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:14:54 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.252.97] (HELO elephant.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:14:42 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-15-193-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.15.193.17]) (as wrowe@rowe-clan.net) by elephant.cnchost.com (ConcentricHost(2.54) Relay) with ESMTP id 1D3E54622; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:14:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <459C54D8.9090702@rowe-clan.net> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:14:00 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org CC: cvs@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r492338 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS References: <20070103225749.95D831A981A@eris.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20070103225749.95D831A981A@eris.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If anyone has a couple cycles to review this, I'd like to tar up 2.2.4 later on tonight. Since this was a nasty fault when it occurred (PR 40470) I still consider it necessary before 2.2 gets bumped. Does anyone have other backports to point out that are showstopper quality, before I T&R? Bill wrowe@apache.org wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Wed Jan 3 14:57:48 2007 > New Revision: 492338 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492338 > Log: > Beg for review > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?view=diff&rev=492338&r1=492337&r2=492338 > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Jan 3 14:57:48 2007 > @@ -198,3 +198,17 @@ > PR: 36609 > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=490156&view=rev > +1: niq > + > + * mod_isapi: One last round, vetted against a number of sample ISAPI > + applications. For the patches to make those PSDK samples work, see > + http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ms_psdk_feb2003_isapi_sample_bugfixes.diff > + Resolves PR 40470. > + Where any response is sent, return OK from the handler. Where there > + is no response (but a status code) return the code. This patch adds > + a great number of debugging emits for failed ap_pass_brigade calls, > + to help diagnose failure cases, and disambiguates OK from APR_SUCCESS. > + Submitted by: wrowe, Matt Eaton > + Patch applies to 2.2 and 2.0 as-is: > + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=492333 > + +1: wrowe > + > > > . >