If anyone has a couple cycles to review this, I'd like to tar up 2.2.4 later
on tonight. Since this was a nasty fault when it occurred (PR 40470) I still
consider it necessary before 2.2 gets bumped.
Does anyone have other backports to point out that are showstopper quality,
before I T&R?
Bill
wrowe@apache.org wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Wed Jan 3 14:57:48 2007
> New Revision: 492338
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492338
> Log:
> Beg for review
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?view=diff&rev=492338&r1=492337&r2=492338
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Jan 3 14:57:48 2007
> @@ -198,3 +198,17 @@
> PR: 36609
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=490156&view=rev
> +1: niq
> +
> + * mod_isapi: One last round, vetted against a number of sample ISAPI
> + applications. For the patches to make those PSDK samples work, see
> + http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ms_psdk_feb2003_isapi_sample_bugfixes.diff
> + Resolves PR 40470.
> + Where any response is sent, return OK from the handler. Where there
> + is no response (but a status code) return the code. This patch adds
> + a great number of debugging emits for failed ap_pass_brigade calls,
> + to help diagnose failure cases, and disambiguates OK from APR_SUCCESS.
> + Submitted by: wrowe, Matt Eaton <asf divinehawk.com>
> + Patch applies to 2.2 and 2.0 as-is:
> + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=492333
> + +1: wrowe
> +
>
>
> .
>
|