httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jorge Schrauwen" <jorge.schrau...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.2.4 windows binary w/ssl?
Date Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:40:12 GMT
On 1/11/07, Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net> wrote:
>
>
> >     ./configure; make; make install
> >
> >     We don't deposit a certificate today for Unix.  After considering
> >     this a bit
> >     more, I agree with jerenkrantz.
> >
> >
> > True... if you don't enable mod_ssl by default and add a note in the
> > conf file It should be rather safe to not include a cert. Pointing them
> > to a docs or wiki guide/how to would be a good idea.
>
> I'd agree if mod_ssl is disabled by default, but if it is, why are they
> downloading the mod_ssl-enabled installer?
>
> The "stupid user" issue you mention is a great answer here, but not good
> enough to disabled mod_ssl by default if there are seperate SSL and
> non-SSL installers.
>
>
>

Good point on this, it makes no sense to have mod_ssl disabled in the ssl
binary. My silly mistake.


-- 
~Jorge

Mime
View raw message