httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Add 2.2.4 to bugzilla
Date Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:33:45 GMT
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:11:18PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
> 
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> 
> >A week sounds good to me. I guess some of them are my fault as I only 
> >set them to resolved fixed and never visited them again as I thought 
> >that they reached their final state. Now I found out that you only 
> >have the option to close it once it has moved to a 'resolved' state 
> >and 'closed' should be the final state. I will take better care of 
> >this in the future.
> >
> >Is there any chance to close all the ones in resolved state that have 
> >not been touched for a week in one blow?
> 
> Absolutely. You can operate on the entire contents of a query  
> result... which gets the job done and will send lots of e-mail.
> 
> Yes, Closed should be the final resting place for bug reports, for  
> good or for bad.

What is the difference between a "RESOLVED" bug and a "CLOSED" one?  Is 
it not possible to re-open/add comments to CLOSED reports or something?  
It's always seemed like a meaningless distinction to me, going through 
marking stuff CLOSED seems like a spam generation exercise.

joe

Mime
View raw message