httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steffen" <i...@apachelounge.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review
Date Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:51:11 GMT
Only meant to help ASF with testing by much ppl as possible.
It is not on the (official)  download page of the Apachelounge.

I  stated to advise ASF, it's a RC and not released by ASF.

When I follow your advise: "... add the binaries to your ApacheLounge
***after*** the vote to release was tallied".

Then I see no way to let so much ppl test to verify the quality.

I plan to remove the binary or that they can download on request to me, a 
pity.

Btw. I see no difference to publish unreleased binaries or sources like you
do.


Steffen


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>; <info@apachelounge.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 18:39
Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review


> Very true.  Steffan, in order to be a community player, we prefer that
> you do NOT publish unreleased binaries unless you VERY CLEARLY designate
> them as YOUR release of the ASF's code.  Even at that, it's in poor form.
>
> Because you participate here, you'll see the vote tally and know when we
> start the short countdown between staging the release, and sending out
> the Announcement.  We appreciate your enthusiasm, and encourage you to
> keep building/keep posting to help us determine if the release is ready.
>
> But we would really *prefer* you actually add the binaries to your
> ApacheLounge ***after*** the vote to release was tallied, please?
>
> Yours,
>
> Bill
>
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On 1/6/07, Steffen <info@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>>> Builds fine with Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1
>>>
>>> It is available with SSL at the Apache Lounge:
>>>
>>> http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1237
>>
>> one note: if 2.2.4 proves to be a dud over the next few days, it won't
>> be "released" by the ASF; that wasn't clear from your introductory
>> post
>> .
>>
>


Mime
View raw message