httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Steffen" <i...@apachelounge.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review
Date Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:41:32 GMT
I only building with the IDE, it embeds the manifests auto.

For a command-line build I should advise:

Do not clutter the makefiles with specific VC2005 stuff,
but use a .bat file to embed the manifests, so no external manifest files:

manifestVC2005.bat

mt -manifest ab.exe.manifest -outputresource:ab.exe;1
mt -manifest httpd.exe.manifest -outputresource:httpd.exe;1
mt -manifest rotatelogs.exe.manifest -outputresource:rotatelogs.exe;1
...
...
mt -manifest mod_actions.so.manifest -outputresource:mod_actions.so;1
mt -manifest mod_alias.so.manifest -outputresource:mod_alias.so;1
...
...
etc. etc.


Steffen


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 20:21
Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review


> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>>> No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual
>>> studio 2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the
>>> manifest files.
>>
>> What trouble?  All the libraries/exe's have a post build step that does 
>> this.
>>
>> Going back to a virgin unpack of the -src.zip - can you point out the 
>> exact
>> issue you encountered?
>
> Nevermind - I see we apparently haven't finished backporting the .manifest
> work from SVN trunk/ (the 2.3 development branch).
>
> I *really* like your hack Gustavo :)
>
> Steffan - given that you aren't having issues either, which hack did you 
> use
> for the .manifest data?
>
> Bill
> 


Mime
View raw message