Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <1165841856.3167.70.camel@jfcpc>
References: <1165841856.3167.70.camel@jfcpc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <E12F6EC1-ED9A-454B-8302-F986B38ED252@jaguNET.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: httpd-proxy-scoreboard how to go on
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:02:38 -0500
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

You mean removing the mod_proxy usage of scoreboard space
to a "simple" shared memory segment?

I thought the whole idea was to abstract out the
scoreboard so that it was easier for people to add
and remove tables from the scoreboard... the so-called
"generic" scoreboard.

I don't really see the drive or motivation to rip out
the proxy stuff without the generic scoreboard effort
in parallel.

On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Jean-Frederic Clere wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to return the httpd-proxy-scoreboard to its first goal: A
> replacement of the scoreboard by "normal" shared memory.
> To reach this the experiments of health_checker should be removed or
> changed to a provider of bytraffic/byrequest for mod_proxy_balancer.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-Frederic
>