Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96428 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2006 23:35:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2006 23:35:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 65729 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2006 23:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65668 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2006 23:35:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65657 invoked by uid 99); 10 Nov 2006 23:35:07 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:35:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of chip@force-elite.com designates 66.225.25.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.225.25.189] (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (66.225.25.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:34:54 -0800 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (127.0.0.1:50522) by localhost with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:34:13 -0800 Message-ID: <45550C75.3040807@force-elite.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:34:13 -0800 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060426) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Are you shure about this? References: <1163199708.7258.12.camel@test.asus> In-Reply-To: <1163199708.7258.12.camel@test.asus> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Joachim Zobel wrote: > Hi. > > To my surprise several people just expressed the opinion that LUA should > be part of the apache core in the long run. Could you explain for what > purposes you want to do this? Because its fun. > Writing apache modules? Nope. Right in the core. I would suspect it will work best as a 'logic' control type thing, driving how a request is handled, and handling complex configuration logic. -Paul