From dev-return-55446-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Wed Nov 08 20:17:56 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33182 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 20:17:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 20:17:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 6354 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 20:17:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 6303 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 20:17:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 6292 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2006 20:17:59 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:17:59 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:17:46 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E33A1ECB85; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:17:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20061108184754.GA14206@redhat.com> References: <200611081727.kA8HRe523093@devsys.jaguNET.com> <20061108184754.GA14206@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9A33CB66-4F01-443F-91C0-9DF79045DF27@jaguNET.com> Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Time for 2.2.4? Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:17:24 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 8, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Mladen Turk wrote: >>> >>> Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should >>>> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments? >>> >>> I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate >>> is_socket_connected. This is IMHO very crucial >>> for AJP to work. Without that the loadbalancer is >>> unusable for most platforms. >>> >> >> I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and >> that alternate method would, I think, be better >> implemented in APR than directly in httpd... > > Eww, no thanks. AFAIK the same results can be achieved using existing > APR interfaces: a non-blocking apr_socket_recv() passing the MSG_PEEK > flag, as I mentioned this on dev@apr already. > I was referring to an APR apr_is_socket_connected() function. Seems to me that it's a common enough network "test" that providing it directly with an APR call is niceness.