Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40167 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2006 11:27:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2006 11:27:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 83651 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2006 11:27:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82999 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2006 11:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82988 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2006 11:27:10 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:27:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.113.241.148] (HELO iss04.interliant.com) (207.113.241.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 04:27:08 -0700 Received: from EX-007.mail.navisite.com (ex-007.interliant.com [207.113.240.186]) by iss04.interliant.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id k9CBQlV02579 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:26:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.168] ([213.202.114.146]) by EX-007.mail.navisite.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:26:45 -0500 Message-ID: <452E2675.4090402@apache.org> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 13:26:45 +0200 From: Mladen Turk User-Agent: Mozilla MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Issue with persistent http proxy backend connection References: <452D4BB5.8040301@apache.org> <452E24D7.8090103@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <452E24D7.8090103@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2006 11:26:45.0804 (UTC) FILETIME=[4CCCF6C0:01C6EDF1] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > But yes, in theory their remains a race here if the proxy reuses the connection > faster then the backend needs time to close the socket after sending the response. > Does the problem exists with the current trunk as well? The way how trunk detects the closed backend has changed by not using read any more. Regards, Mladen.