Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41688 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2006 04:21:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2006 04:21:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 39438 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2006 09:26:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 39359 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2006 09:26:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 39285 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2006 09:26:05 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:26:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO asgard.webthing.com) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 02:25:52 -0700 Received: from asgard (asgard [192.168.1.2]) by asgard.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CA464527 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:25:28 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Kew Organization: WebThing Ltd To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: AW: mod_deflate and flush? Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:25:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610251025.28093.nick@webthing.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wednesday 25 October 2006 07:05, Pl�m, R�diger, VF EITO wrote: > > mod_deflate breaks that. I know the issue from ssh already. Yep. And Paul's reply refers only to /trunk/, not to released versions. > I know. There are some patches to fix that. These are proposed for backport > to 2.2.x: I've tried to review this, but find it too complex for static review, and for the same reason I don't want to +1 it on a quick-test. So unless we have two more folks with an extra braincell, this is going to need extensive testing to get the +1s it needs for backport. > Keep in mind that people.apache.org is currently down. I would appreciate > if you could test the patches and report back here. +1 to that. A report describing testcases and results in detail could help with getting it backported. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/