Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89939 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2006 21:24:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2006 21:24:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 98491 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2006 21:24:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98471 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2006 21:24:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 98460 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2006 21:24:02 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:24:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Received: from [199.203.54.245] ([199.203.54.245:47963] helo=vl654.host245.netvision.net.il) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 7A/BE-01963-D61B1154 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:23:58 -0700 Received: from [192.168.2.80] (bzq-88-153-173-157.red.bezeqint.net [88.153.173.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.mirimar.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k8KLNqoh023932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:23:54 +0300 Message-ID: <4511B169.9050002@beamartyr.net> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:23:53 +0300 From: Issac Goldstand Organization: Mirimar Networks User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_cache responsibilities vs mod_xxx_cache provider responsibilities References: <45085C32.7070603@beamartyr.net> <0A36A991-68A8-4F16-A876-07FA6BD18D16@haxent.com.br> <450AEB58.6050604@turner.com> <450DB44A.2070408@sharp.fm> <45114330.5060000@beamartyr.net> <45115DF4.5030706@turner.com> <22319.196.8.104.37.1158767539.squirrel@www.sharp.fm> <4511881A.7030102@beamartyr.net> <45119B6D.7050404@apache.org> <45119DB1.8000504@beamartyr.net> <4511A88C.6040808@apache.org> <4511B07A.702@beamartyr.net> In-Reply-To: <4511B07A.702@beamartyr.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://www.beamartyr.net/pubkey.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1914/Wed Sep 20 22:24:45 2006 on hector.mirimar.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > "This differs from a content coding in that the transfer-coding is a > property of the message, not of the original entity." > > Based on that, it seems to be ok. However, we'd have to remove strong > ETags as a side-effect if it was done (since strong ETags change when > entity headers change). I'm too tired - I'm not even reading my own points. Based on the above "property of the message, not property of the entity", this may not be true. I'm going to go to bed now, before I make a bigger fool of myself than I've already managed to this evening. Issac