httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davi Arnaut <d...@haxent.com.br>
Subject Re: mod_cache responsibilities vs mod_xxx_cache provider responsibilities
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:07:50 GMT

On 14/09/2006, at 08:48, Graham Leggett wrote:

> On Thu, September 14, 2006 1:42 pm, Davi Arnaut wrote:
>
>> This is not a top priority since actually there is no complete
>> support for it in mod_cache (partial responses and such), but it
>> would be nice to have it.
>
> HTTP/1.1 compliance is mandatory for the cache. If it doesn't work  
> now, it
> needs to be fixed.

The cache is required to send to the client the most up-to-date  
response, it doesn't mean it must cache it.

What I meant is _if_ it causes significant slowdowns for a common  
cache hit path _probably_ it is better to just revalidate the hole  
entity.

--
Davi Arnaut


Mime
View raw message