Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86806 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2006 13:19:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2006 13:19:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39044 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2006 13:19:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38981 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2006 13:19:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38970 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2006 13:19:03 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 06:19:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.192.6] (HELO devsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.192.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 06:19:02 -0700 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.13.7/jag-2.6) id k73DIdC16119 for dev@httpd.apache.org; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:18:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200608031318.k73DIdC16119@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: balancer To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:18:35 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "Mladen Turk" at Aug 03, 2006 02:45:12 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mladen Turk wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I guess we've all agreed that checking hot standbys 1st before > > checking other sets is what makes the most sense, so I've gone > > ahead and enabled that. -trunk is now complete (except for > > the docs)... > > > > Right. > In all other cases it really does not mater where > the next request will go, cause it will certainty > loose the session. > Of course the presumption is that the members of > the set (or domain in mod_jk) have the session > replication set up. > That's right. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."