Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46055 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2006 17:40:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2006 17:40:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 48793 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2006 17:40:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 48735 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2006 17:40:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 48724 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jul 2006 17:40:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:40:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:40:14 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C2728FE57 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:39:54 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <44C4FB3A.8050008@rowe-clan.net> References: <52C3F4EA-22C7-4E11-85B7-E3C368EB8B65@jaguNET.com> <44C4FB3A.8050008@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <443D5C03-AEFD-4F8E-AB1C-BE3A7EB00571@jaguNET.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:39:53 -0400 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I don't want the 2.2.3 release to be held up too much, but there >> are some things being worked on in the proxy balancer code >> that would be useful to be available in 2.2.3. Mladen and >> JFC are working on the AJP stuff and as soon as they >> commit their changes, I'll be adding in my balancer set >> patches (to trunk). > > All of this sounds great! But I'm planning to T&R by Wednesday, it's > just been way too long since we've had a release. Pathetic really :) > Let's not rush the backports then. +1 for T&R on Wednesday, since there are some things that *really* need to be released. We can then do a quick 2.2.4 in a month to capture the balancer and other goodies.