httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO <>
Subject Re: hot standby in proxy added
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:51:53 GMT

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jim Jagielski 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2006 00:55
> An:
> Betreff: Re: hot standby in proxy added

> My thoughts are how to make this better; overloading the concept
> of "disabled" workers to mean multiple things depending on
> different situations seems glocky to me. Stopped should mean
> stopped, disabled should mean disabled.

But what should be the difference between stopped and disabled in this case?

> I do like the distance attribute and am looking at the best
> way to impl something similar while still keeping things as
> abstracted out as possible. Almost a sort of "balancer set"
> would be nice, where, for example, you define a balancer
> set with some members as set #1, and they would "always" be
> chosen (and looked at for LB) and set #2 (and later) would only
> be considered if no one in set #1 is available.

...or if no one matches the given route in #1?



View raw message