httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: proxy balancer backports for 2.2.3
Date Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:29:09 GMT
yeah, it's a bit of an overhead, but it allows
for one-to-one mapping of SVN commits to each new
feature. And it makes it easier for
people to follow what each smallish patch
does (and therefore +1 it) rather than wrapping
their heads around something larger.

On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:

> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> There are lots of things to backport. IMHO its the entire HEAD,
>>> and spread over the multiple svn commits.
>>> How we should deal with that?
>>> Having multiple backports or a single one?
>>>
>> we should simply update STATUS as usually... most of the
>> backports are self contained enough and non-dependent
>> to allow that, I think.
>>
>
> It looks like bureaucratic overhead to me :)
> But OK, we can have multiple STATUS entries.
>
> Regards,
> Mladen.
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message