httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Colm MacCarthaigh <c...@stdlib.net>
Subject Re: load balancer "cluster" set
Date Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:30:37 GMT
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:22:03PM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> The simple solution is to buy a bigger piece of hardware or outsource
> the problem to the relevent experts.
> 
> Trying to do meaningful load-balancing within an application will not be
> simple.  At the router it is simple.  All the required data is present
> in one spot.

Load-balancing can be implemented at any arbitrary point in the stack
(Ethernet/IP/DNS/TCP/HTTP/Application) and each has its own problems and
features. There is nothing particularly appealing about doing it at the
routing layer (though it does present a few novel options like using
anycast or a TCP redirect), and doing it there has a few problems of its
own.

Either way, the more options and the more flexibility, the better. In
the real world, you may find that many operations use multiple 
load-balancing techniques toghether (e.g. Google uses DNS, L2, L3 and 
L4 load-balancing).

-- 
Colm MacCárthaigh                        Public Key: colm+pgp@stdlib.net

Mime
View raw message