Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72284 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 12:39:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 12:39:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 41672 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 12:39:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41588 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 12:39:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41530 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2006 12:39:38 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 05:39:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jagunet.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 05:39:36 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jagunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB0F199D74 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:39:15 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: restructuring mod_ssl as an overlay Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:39:15 -0400 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jun 7, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Given those constraints, I would prefer to separate the httpd releases > into a non-crypto package and a crypto overlay, similar to what most > of the packaging redistributors do (fink, apt, etc.). > Is the concern that we bundle mod_ssl with httpd via source or that we also provide binary packages which have mod_ssl? I think, personally, we should just release the source and drop the whole binary packages as well. If that doesn't address the issue, then I think we should have 2 releases: one with mod_ssl and one without.