Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59600 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2006 16:22:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2006 16:22:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 21066 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 16:22:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 20905 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 16:22:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 20842 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2006 16:22:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:22:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.113.241.148] (HELO iss04.interliant.com) (207.113.241.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:22:07 -0700 Received: from EX-008.mail.navisite.com (ex-008.interliant.com [207.113.240.188]) by iss04.interliant.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id k5JGQi828793 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:26:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.168] ([213.202.113.124]) by EX-008.mail.navisite.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:21:41 -0500 Message-ID: <4496CF17.60008@apache.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:21:43 +0200 From: Mladen Turk User-Agent: Mozilla MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HTTPD Developers List Subject: mod_proxy_balancer/mod_proxy_ajp TODO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2006 16:21:42.0281 (UTC) FILETIME=[7337CF90:01C693BC] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi guys, I'm would like to give few notes on the things I'm currently working on, so that eventually no duplicate work is done if someone already have similar things on his drawing board. 1. Additional by business load balancing method that will load balance on the actual load of the beckend servers. The servers that have shorter reply time will get more load. 2. Hot standby support. Something we have recently added to the mod_jk that allows to have the 'hot-standby' backend node, that sits there and does nothing until all the other nodes fail. 3. CPING/CPONG support for the AJP protocol, for checking the status of the backend server prior of sending the data itself. Comments? Regards, Mladen.