Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: AW: Fold mod_proxy_fcgi into trunk (and maybe 2.2...)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:29:37 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <F6E88684A95CDB4DBBD5B9F4C1C4B09B020EB20B@vis01-mx02.vis.internal.vodafone.com>
Thread-Topic: Fold mod_proxy_fcgi into trunk (and maybe 2.2...)
Thread-Index: AcZjvEFSwRi4QjvvRhqtpvl5GQ3OZwAAGIVg
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VF_EITO?=
 <ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>


> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jim Jagielski=20
>=20
>=20
> I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
> we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
> of it being backported to 2.2.x and some not-too-distant
> future.
>=20
> Comments?
>

Questions:

I am a lazy guy :-).
Would it be possible for you to provide the changes as a diff that
need to be applied to the *existing* sources on the trunk?
This would help to understand what changes in the existing files as a
result of this merge.

Are there any test cases for the test framework to check the FastCGI =
module?


Regards

R=FCdiger