Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45572 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2006 19:47:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2006 19:47:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 43529 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2006 19:47:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 43462 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2006 19:47:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 43451 invoked by uid 99); 7 Apr 2006 19:47:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:47:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.248.72] (HELO tonnant.cnchost.com) (207.155.248.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:47:45 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.21] (c-24-15-193-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.15.193.17]) by tonnant.cnchost.com id PAA14876; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:47:24 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-ID: <4436C1CA.50307@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 14:47:22 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA References: <43e40e000604070154h6a126604q6d8d575560f0cbb8@mail.gmail.com> <4436370A.4010202@rowe-clan.net> <43e40e000604070410x59be2031h3fad3344617527a3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43e40e000604070410x59be2031h3fad3344617527a3@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jorge Schrauwen wrote: > Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply > totaled if trying as Win64. Yup, mostly hopeless back then. > Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO. > Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea... Couple observations; pcre is quite LP64 dirty; this is observed under darwin x686 and win64. so don't necessarily expect 2.2.1 to build win64 clean yet out of the zip, and it may be a few more cycles before every issuees is resolved. It brings up a good question, which contributors are monitoring our flavor of pcre for updates from the pcre community, and liasoning back our changes to pcre to it's project?