Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77635 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2006 12:11:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2006 12:11:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 28507 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2006 12:11:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28428 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2006 12:10:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 28416 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2006 12:10:59 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 05:10:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 05:10:59 -0700 Received: (qmail 77554 invoked by uid 2161); 2 Apr 2006 12:10:38 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id B1FDF1721C for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 14:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <442FBF38.8000009@apache.org> Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 14:10:32 +0200 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 X-Accept-Language: de, en, de-de, en-gb, cy, zu, xh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA References: <200604020040.k320e9Z10393@devsys.jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <200604020040.k320e9Z10393@devsys.jaguNET.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 04/02/2006 02:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >>Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237&view=rev has not been >>backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(. >>So I am now -1. >>Should I propose r379237 for backport? > > > ++1 ! :) Proposed for backport as r390812. Sorry for not noticing earlier that this patch was missing :-(. Regards RĂ¼diger