Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
Organization: WebThing Ltd
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mod_proxy_http ProxyErrorOverride eating cookies
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:47:11 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <44311DB6.2010603@hippo.nl> <444CA770.7070908@hippo.nl>
In-Reply-To: <444CA770.7070908@hippo.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200604241247.13552.nick@webthing.com>

On Monday 24 April 2006 11:24, Bart van der Schans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm quite new to the list, so I'm just wondering how it works. Jeff
> Tharp and I created a bug report and proposed a patch to fix it:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39245
>
> To me it's seems to be a quite trivial patch for something that is just
> working incorrectly. It looks like "nothing is happening"  :(  It neither
> accepted nor denied..

To break back-compatibility as suggested there would be wrong.
But what you suggest makes sense if we make it a configuration
option, maybe by updating the ProxyErrorOverride directive to
enable options to treat redirects either as errors or non-errors.

-- 
Nick Kew