httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Justin Erenkrantz" <>
Subject Re: Copyright Dates (Was: Re: [VOTE] 2.0.57 candidate)
Date Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:04:32 GMT
On 4/21/06, Martin Cooper <> wrote:
> You are correct. Only the years in which the file was actually changed
> should be listed in the copyright.

If we want to get pedantic, it should only be year of first publication.  ;-)

For reference, here's Larry Rosen's post to legal-discuss@ on the form
of copyright notice:

(There are some other things in that post that are policy issues
instead of legal issues - which is where we tend to get diverging
opinions; but Larry's description of the form of notice is accurate.)

HTH.  -- justin

View raw message