httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <>
Subject Re: PR 31759 - default handler returns output filter apr_status_t value
Date Sat, 01 Apr 2006 21:51:08 GMT

On 03/31/2006 06:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> Some concerns about the else path:
> a) is 500 proper?  should it just return OK instead?

I think 500 is good.

> b) what about logging that path to ensure that the administrator has
> some help diagnosing the problem, since we can't carry the
> apr_status_t any further than here?
> There are concerns of too much logging (filter has already logged
> something) or too little logging (filter didn't log anything).  The
> access log won't have any strong hints that something bad happened
> since r->status didn't get changed and c->aborted didn't get set.

What about the debug level for this log message? Would this be a compromise
between too much logging and no logging?



View raw message